miles01110
Apr 24, 08:38 PM
Would appreciate if you could elaborate. Cheers.
http://ca.lifehacker.com/5759186/five-best-vpn-service-providers
http://ca.lifehacker.com/5759186/five-best-vpn-service-providers
Damo01
Apr 22, 02:46 AM
Your problem may have something to with your virtual Machine your using according to screenshots, which probably using up all your 3 GB installed RAM. Look as though your mac is just using 3 GB RAM instead of 6 GB RAM.
y0zza
May 3, 06:45 PM
As some have mentioned, the Late 2008 Unibody uses DDR3 1067 MHz.
RAM from the 2011 MBP will work fine albeit at 1067 MHz.
I upgraded to 8GB DDR3 1333 in my Late 2008 (was same price as the DDR3 1067) and the same sticks are working fine in the new 2011 MBP.
RAM from the 2011 MBP will work fine albeit at 1067 MHz.
I upgraded to 8GB DDR3 1333 in my Late 2008 (was same price as the DDR3 1067) and the same sticks are working fine in the new 2011 MBP.
Koodauw
Dec 20, 07:09 PM
Perhaps you plugged in your firewire cord backwards?
more...
jvaska
Feb 23, 10:43 AM
I got the same error message...I use CocalMySQL too...
Matthew Yohe
Dec 28, 02:59 AM
I'm guessing that this is a bug that would be fixed in the future when OS X supports writing to NTFS volumes natively.
So, if you want to share something on your Mac over the network, and you want to define users and their permissions, you should make sure that the folders that you're sharing are on a drive or partition formatted to HFS+.
Ah nice, but don't expect OSX to support writing to NTFS in the future. The way that things like 3G-NTFS or whatever write to a NTFS volume is sort of hacky anyway. If you can, I would look into using exFAT now instead of NTFS (if that works for your environment).
So, if you want to share something on your Mac over the network, and you want to define users and their permissions, you should make sure that the folders that you're sharing are on a drive or partition formatted to HFS+.
Ah nice, but don't expect OSX to support writing to NTFS in the future. The way that things like 3G-NTFS or whatever write to a NTFS volume is sort of hacky anyway. If you can, I would look into using exFAT now instead of NTFS (if that works for your environment).
more...
atrac7
Apr 4, 09:12 PM
More than likely if I were to take it to the Apple store I'd have restored by then...which hopefully would alleviate the problem at that point.
My main point is, if I have no recourse in my current jailbroken state, what options are the best to restore yet not have to upgrade my firmware (aka losing the chance to jailbreak untethered)
My main point is, if I have no recourse in my current jailbroken state, what options are the best to restore yet not have to upgrade my firmware (aka losing the chance to jailbreak untethered)
Hellhammer
Mar 16, 12:16 PM
I would install it in the HD. It's not that buggy but I wouldn't keep it as my only OS.
more...
NYR99
Apr 30, 11:19 PM
They are in what I guess is the root directory of Macintosh HD. They are in the first folder that opens when I double click on Macintosh HD from the desktop.
pandre
Mar 12, 10:42 PM
I was experiencing the same message ("None of the items in this playlist can be burned to disc", even while trying to burn a regular audio CD.
The message appeared when I had the playlist selected on the left, then pressed burn.
I tried checking all the check boxes next to the songs in the list. This allowed me burn the disc.
It seems like a bug -- why wouldn't itunes just alert me that "no items were selected to burn"?
The message appeared when I had the playlist selected on the left, then pressed burn.
I tried checking all the check boxes next to the songs in the list. This allowed me burn the disc.
It seems like a bug -- why wouldn't itunes just alert me that "no items were selected to burn"?
more...
dan-o-mac
Dec 9, 06:20 PM
Are you open to any trades? I have a 4GB White Nano that I'm looking to trade.
Chundles
Sep 27, 09:55 AM
One of my old college rooms had just one power outlet and the phone/ethernet outlet was on the other side of the room to where you could put anything. I had a 10m Cat5 cable and 4 extension leads strapped to the walls and the ceiling attached to powerboards - must have been at least 15 different appliances running off two plugs. But it held up and actually looked kinda cool.
more...
Zen0Jin
May 6, 07:54 AM
WD Caviar Black here on standard 3.4GHz model from Apple store.
Seagate 7200.12 on Top end 3.4ghz retail model.
Seagate 7200.12 on Top end 3.4ghz retail model.
Scepticalscribe
Feb 16, 07:18 AM
Go with the 5th Gen Nano[/B]
If you..
- want superior battery life
- want superior capacity
- hard drive fragility isn't a issue for you
- interested in holding video (16GB nano isn't going to do much for holding video)
- don't mind the larger form factor (some prefer it, fits much more comfortably in hand for me in comparison to the nano)
Go with the classic
Very well put, and I agree with your conclusion. To the OP, my recommendation also would be to go for the classic.
Cheers
If you..
- want superior battery life
- want superior capacity
- hard drive fragility isn't a issue for you
- interested in holding video (16GB nano isn't going to do much for holding video)
- don't mind the larger form factor (some prefer it, fits much more comfortably in hand for me in comparison to the nano)
Go with the classic
Very well put, and I agree with your conclusion. To the OP, my recommendation also would be to go for the classic.
Cheers
more...
job
Oct 20, 08:56 PM
i think blakespot also runs the ipodhacks.com site.
Jeffx342
Sep 29, 09:55 PM
heres the other pic
more...
AmereckanPsycho
May 5, 09:21 PM
It's in Tokyo:
Image (http://martindesu.tumblr.com/post/1010745566/iphone-4-advert-in-japan-iphone-cm)
Click for my blog.
Awesome.
Image (http://martindesu.tumblr.com/post/1010745566/iphone-4-advert-in-japan-iphone-cm)
Click for my blog.
Awesome.
MacRumors
Nov 16, 10:05 PM
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com/iphone/2009/11/16/apple-releases-two-new-iphone-ads-song-gift/)
http://images.macrumors.com/article/2009/11/16/230318-gift.jpg
Perez Hilton claims that
http://images.macrumors.com/article/2009/11/16/230318-gift.jpg
Jolly Giant
Apr 23, 03:48 AM
taken from this (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3641) support article:
With the iTunes Store, all sales are final. As soon as you click the
Buy button (using either 1-Click or the Shopping Cart) your purchases are charged
to the credit card on your Apple Account. You cannot cancel a purchase or receive
a refund for a purchase.
however, the iTS is known to make the occasional exception, so here's for hoping ...
With the iTunes Store, all sales are final. As soon as you click the
Buy button (using either 1-Click or the Shopping Cart) your purchases are charged
to the credit card on your Apple Account. You cannot cancel a purchase or receive
a refund for a purchase.
however, the iTS is known to make the occasional exception, so here's for hoping ...
miles01110
May 5, 04:55 PM
That's interesting. The way I understand it is that I can buy my Mac somewhere else and then go to Apple within 14 days to buy the 1to1. Am I understanding that correctly?
No, because it only applies to Macs bought at one of the listed locations.
No, because it only applies to Macs bought at one of the listed locations.
heyroth
Jun 21, 12:26 AM
Any one planning to camp out?
Eeep, Emeryville. Too far for me. I'll be in burlingame
Eeep, Emeryville. Too far for me. I'll be in burlingame
Legion93
Apr 29, 04:29 PM
Chuck it in the bin.
netdog
Apr 22, 01:21 PM
It's getting louder because Skype is a CPU-intensive program, which causes your processor to heat up. The noise you hear are the cooling fans. Any video chat program will do the same thing.
I never use video in Skype, and to be honest, Skype can pound on the processor even when it's supposedly doing nothing but monitoring what contacts are online and waiting for any incoming communications.
Because it makes my fans scream frequently when idling, I think it's a really poorly written program. Other VOIP programs aren't so CPU intensive.
I never use video in Skype, and to be honest, Skype can pound on the processor even when it's supposedly doing nothing but monitoring what contacts are online and waiting for any incoming communications.
Because it makes my fans scream frequently when idling, I think it's a really poorly written program. Other VOIP programs aren't so CPU intensive.
harpster
Apr 7, 09:43 AM
You're a star! I just tested it with my hotmail address and it works but its not going to my other email which it needs to, any ideas?
Its not even landing in the trash...
Email can be a pain.... your other account could be trashing it, who knows... try to get as simple and basic as you can with your testing. I also use phpmailer you might want to look into that. Good luck.
Its not even landing in the trash...
Email can be a pain.... your other account could be trashing it, who knows... try to get as simple and basic as you can with your testing. I also use phpmailer you might want to look into that. Good luck.
No comments:
Post a Comment