CSPAmom
08-13 02:17 PM
Hi all,
I'm wondering if there are any successful cases where CSPA and the Patriot Act were combined to ensure that the child remains under 21? My son's name has been deleted from the derivative beneficiary's list, however, he can remain eligible under this F-4 petition if the Consular calculate his age with Patriot Act 45 days. In that case, he can benefit from CSPA. Our case details as below:
Priority Date: Oct. 16, 1996
Approval Date: Dec. 4, 1996
Days of Petition Pending: 49 days
Child's 21st Birthday: May 31, 2007
Child's age when visa became current: 21 years 62 days
Need your advices. Thanks!
I'm wondering if there are any successful cases where CSPA and the Patriot Act were combined to ensure that the child remains under 21? My son's name has been deleted from the derivative beneficiary's list, however, he can remain eligible under this F-4 petition if the Consular calculate his age with Patriot Act 45 days. In that case, he can benefit from CSPA. Our case details as below:
Priority Date: Oct. 16, 1996
Approval Date: Dec. 4, 1996
Days of Petition Pending: 49 days
Child's 21st Birthday: May 31, 2007
Child's age when visa became current: 21 years 62 days
Need your advices. Thanks!
wallpaper Lady GaGa - Judas by
cam23
06-24 08:44 PM
Hi All
I worked for a company A till July 2006. Company A had applied for my Green Card using RIR process. I got my Labor certification approved and company A applied for I-140.
In August 2006 company B acquired company A. Company B moved me to a different physical location and different state.
Company B amended my I-140 application filed by Company A to preserve the priority date. Now company B is planning to file I-485 for this ongoing I-140 application.
My Questions:
Is there any risk for I-140 application since company B amended I-140 application filed by Company A?
I am asking so as company B moved me to a different state and labor used to file amended I-140 was based on company A and its location.
I worked for a company A till July 2006. Company A had applied for my Green Card using RIR process. I got my Labor certification approved and company A applied for I-140.
In August 2006 company B acquired company A. Company B moved me to a different physical location and different state.
Company B amended my I-140 application filed by Company A to preserve the priority date. Now company B is planning to file I-485 for this ongoing I-140 application.
My Questions:
Is there any risk for I-140 application since company B amended I-140 application filed by Company A?
I am asking so as company B moved me to a different state and labor used to file amended I-140 was based on company A and its location.
jonty_11
07-24 05:20 PM
I am not sure if Attorney is allowed to sign on place where it says : "APPLICANT"
u may have to give written permission/Notarized for that...
By signing Form G28, u are only authorizing the attorney to represent u in this case...not sign for u.
u may have to give written permission/Notarized for that...
By signing Form G28, u are only authorizing the attorney to represent u in this case...not sign for u.
2011 Lady Gaga - Judas guitar cover
saravanaraj.sathya
08-23 10:14 PM
Bump
I sent pm to the ppl around Buffalo, NY. Pl respond.
I sent pm to the ppl around Buffalo, NY. Pl respond.
more...
ciab
09-05 10:57 PM
i could use a flash footer.
couldnt be bothered doing it myself.....
couldnt be bothered doing it myself.....
icecolor
09-12 09:01 AM
What does this mean?
On September 10, 2007, we mailed you a notice that we have approved this I765 APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION. Please follow any instructions on the notice. If you move before you receive the notice, call customer service.
Does it mean that they mailed the letter that it is approved or did they mail the card?
On September 10, 2007, we mailed you a notice that we have approved this I765 APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION. Please follow any instructions on the notice. If you move before you receive the notice, call customer service.
Does it mean that they mailed the letter that it is approved or did they mail the card?
more...
Blog Feeds
09-01 10:00 AM
Hunton Immigration and Nationality Law Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
The U.S. Department of State has confirmed that contractors on a pre-approved list (http://www.huntonfiles.com/files/webupload/Immigration_DOS_KCC_Approved_Auditor_List_Aug_2010 .pdf)at the Kentucky Consular Center (KCC) are now auditing approved nonimmigrant petitions -- including H-1B and L-1 petitions -- in order to verify that information contained in the petitions is correct. The audits are creating significant delays for petition-based visa applicants at embassies worldwide.
Auditors may make a "cold call" to the U.S. employer who filed the petition, asking about the company's activities, location, employees, shareholders, etc., and may also review the company's website or use Google Earth to confirm the existence of a facility in the location specified on the petition. Contractors may also ask employers about the beneficiaries of these petitions -- the foreign nationals whom the employer wishes to employ (or continue employing) in nonimmigrant status.
Following verification, the contractors will create new "base petitioner records" in the KCC's Petition Information Management Service (PIMS) database. Until KCC verifies the petitions and updates these records, no consular officer at a U.S. embassy abroad may issue a petition-based visa to an applicant. Consular officers are also instructed to question visa applicants further in order to determine if the beneficiary information in the updated PIMS record is correct and complete.
Any adverse information the KCC contractor learns during an audit call may lead to denial of a beneficiary's visa application, even based on a previously approved petition, and may also affect the approvability of future petitions. Therefore, a U.S. employer who receives such a call should contact immigration counsel prior to providing any information so that (a) the auditor's name and credentials can be compared against the approved list (http://www.huntonfiles.com/files/webupload/Immigration_DOS_KCC_Approved_Auditor_List_Aug_2010 .pdf); (b) counsel can be present on the call; (c) the employer can prepare adequately by reviewing the petition; and (d) the call can be documented appropriately.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~4/hh_pmij8WeY
More... (http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~3/hh_pmij8WeY/)
The U.S. Department of State has confirmed that contractors on a pre-approved list (http://www.huntonfiles.com/files/webupload/Immigration_DOS_KCC_Approved_Auditor_List_Aug_2010 .pdf)at the Kentucky Consular Center (KCC) are now auditing approved nonimmigrant petitions -- including H-1B and L-1 petitions -- in order to verify that information contained in the petitions is correct. The audits are creating significant delays for petition-based visa applicants at embassies worldwide.
Auditors may make a "cold call" to the U.S. employer who filed the petition, asking about the company's activities, location, employees, shareholders, etc., and may also review the company's website or use Google Earth to confirm the existence of a facility in the location specified on the petition. Contractors may also ask employers about the beneficiaries of these petitions -- the foreign nationals whom the employer wishes to employ (or continue employing) in nonimmigrant status.
Following verification, the contractors will create new "base petitioner records" in the KCC's Petition Information Management Service (PIMS) database. Until KCC verifies the petitions and updates these records, no consular officer at a U.S. embassy abroad may issue a petition-based visa to an applicant. Consular officers are also instructed to question visa applicants further in order to determine if the beneficiary information in the updated PIMS record is correct and complete.
Any adverse information the KCC contractor learns during an audit call may lead to denial of a beneficiary's visa application, even based on a previously approved petition, and may also affect the approvability of future petitions. Therefore, a U.S. employer who receives such a call should contact immigration counsel prior to providing any information so that (a) the auditor's name and credentials can be compared against the approved list (http://www.huntonfiles.com/files/webupload/Immigration_DOS_KCC_Approved_Auditor_List_Aug_2010 .pdf); (b) counsel can be present on the call; (c) the employer can prepare adequately by reviewing the petition; and (d) the call can be documented appropriately.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~4/hh_pmij8WeY
More... (http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~3/hh_pmij8WeY/)
2010 Lady Gaga Drops #39;Judas#39; Early
h1bee
09-19 10:29 AM
@itsmesabby: No this was my stamping after my first extension. It was cancelld at Kolkata consulate.
@vban2007: Are you sure that I can do a transfer? Or should a fresh H1B be filed by the new employer?
@vban2007: Are you sure that I can do a transfer? Or should a fresh H1B be filed by the new employer?
more...
lj_rr
05-11 02:23 PM
Hi,
My confirmation receipt says.
Please mail in any supporting documentation to this address:
US Mail:
Attn: E-Filed I-765
USCIS Nebraska Service Center
P.O. Box 87373
Should this be send by USPS or Fedex. What did you guys do?
My confirmation receipt says.
Please mail in any supporting documentation to this address:
US Mail:
Attn: E-Filed I-765
USCIS Nebraska Service Center
P.O. Box 87373
Should this be send by USPS or Fedex. What did you guys do?
hair +nationality+is+lady+gaga
deba
06-12 04:39 PM
Whoever you choose, please do not go to Keshab Raj Seadie. His office is at 146 West 29th Street, NY. Phone: (212) 571-6002. Aptly named website: greencardmaker.com should be renamed greencardsucker.com
He is another worthless desi lawyer. Stay away from him! Only interested in taking your money. Poor service and once you have parted with your money good luck getting any timely response by phone or email. I have had very bad experience dealing with his office and don't be fooled by recommendations on his website saying he is very responsive etc.
He is another worthless desi lawyer. Stay away from him! Only interested in taking your money. Poor service and once you have parted with your money good luck getting any timely response by phone or email. I have had very bad experience dealing with his office and don't be fooled by recommendations on his website saying he is very responsive etc.
more...
kanshul
12-18 10:02 AM
I am sure it is not enforcable...
Talk to a good lawyer but usually if your company places you at a client location it is not really a business entity but more like a "Placement Agency"; many states will not consider a non compete b/n a placement agency and an employee.
Talk to a good lawyer but usually if your company places you at a client location it is not really a business entity but more like a "Placement Agency"; many states will not consider a non compete b/n a placement agency and an employee.
hot Lady+gaga+judas+cover
gparr
November 28th, 2004, 09:05 AM
Thanks to all and welcome to dphoto Jamie
Gary
Gary